clock_nanosleep for uClibc 0.9.27
Baruch Siach
baruch at tkos.co.il
Tue Oct 7 19:56:30 UTC 2014
Hi Travis,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:40:28PM -0400, Travis J. Weaver wrote:
> Where would I put this? In a file called clock_nanosleep.c in the librt
> directory? If so, are there any "includes" that I need to include?
> time.h/errno.h/syscall.h?
Just put it near the code using clock_nanosleep() as part of your program
source. You need to include unistd.h and sys/syscall.h. See the syscall(2) man
page.
baruch
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Baruch Siach [mailto:baruch at tkos.co.il]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 3:22 PM
> To: Travis J. Weaver
> Cc: uclibc at uclibc.org
> Subject: Re: clock_nanosleep for uClibc 0.9.27
>
> Hi Travis,
>
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:56:14PM -0400, Travis J. Weaver wrote:
> > I know I'm using an older uClibc version. This is what is in my SDK
> > and instead of retooling or upgrading the whole thing, I'm wondering
> > if there is a possible patch that can work for this version that would
> > give me the use of clock_nanosleep? If not, what are some possible
> > suggestions that I can try? Would a later version of uClibc that has
> > clock_nanosleep work with my current kernel?
> >
> > uClibc: 0.9.27
> > Kernel: 2.6.30.4
>
> How about (untested):
>
> int clock_nanosleep(clockid_t clock_id, int flags, const struct timespec
> *request,
> struct timespec *remain) {
> return syscall(__NR_clock_nanosleep, clock_id, flags, request,
> remain); }
>
> baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
More information about the uClibc
mailing list