[PATCH 2/2] ldso: make hashcode handling more generic
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Wed Jan 22 22:15:46 UTC 2014
On 13 January 2014 17:18, Chris Zankel <chris at zankel.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had a chance to look at these changes again? I
> have attached the two patches we propose so we can add support for TLS
> descriptors.
>
> It would be great to get an ACK for it (or NACK with maybe some other
> suggestions).
I did not have a chance to look at it yet, no.
I've been side-tracked attempting to understand gold's POV on TLS (or
static tls or however it is called, think dreaded tsd. Holler if that
rings a bell,
i could use somebody filling in my gaps of interest in that area ;).. Going
through the backlog now but it's getting too late for me today to continue.
More information about the uClibc
mailing list