Doing a release?
carmelo73 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 21 15:36:52 UTC 2013
Il 20 settembre 2013 08:41:25 Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> ha scritto:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Dear Khem Raj,
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > > It'd be really nice if uClibc adopted a slightly more frequent
> > > > release schedule, to more easily allow downstream users to benefit
> > > > from improvements/fixes.
> > > > I think, if we decide to do releases biannually maintaining branches
> > > for long time can be avoided. To get started I think lets start by
> > > planning for a 0.9.34 and then everyone sending the pending patches
> > > for subsequent 0.9.35 and so on.
> > Since I'm not a uClibc contributor, it's certainly quite easy for me to
> > just speak, but I would like to advocate for a time-based release
> > schedule. I believe that for many projects, time-based release
> > schedules create a rhythm, that provides well-known deadlines and
> > encourages the entire community to meet those deadlines.
> Agreed. Time-based release schedule has worked very well for musl,
> too, but with much shorter release intervals, usually 1-2 months.
I agree too but 1 or 2 is too short IMO. A 3 month schedule would be better.
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
Inviato con AquaMail per Android
More information about the uClibc