Troubleshooting statically built application using backtrace.

[Filippo ARCIDIACONO]

On 5/9/2013 6:32 AM, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> Il giorno 08/mag/2013 22:33, "ANDY KENNEDY" <ANDY.KENNEDY at adtran.com> ha
> scritto:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Carmelo Amoroso [mailto:carmelo73 at gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 2:36 PM
>>> To: ANDY KENNEDY
>>> Cc: uclibc at uclibc.org
>>> Subject: Re: Troubleshooting statically built application using
> backtrace.
>>> Andy
>>> I'll commit fixes forma backtrace with static applications tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Thanks forma tour patience
>>> Carmelo
>> Carmelo,
>>
>> Okay cool!  Can you tell me what you've found so far?
>>
>> My next step was to disable the "New" way of doing the dl_hash.  I've just
>> built a new config with that disabled and am completing the toolchain now.
>>
> We have actually fixed it. Static dlopen was broken

The patches fixes the infinite loop and extend the backtrace support in 
statically linked app,
has been committed in master branch and cherry piched in 0.9.33 branch.
Moreover to properly build the libubacktrace you should manually apply 
the patch posted in
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2013-May/047772.html
It will be committed shortly if no objections are raised.

>
>> Will that do what I'm expecting or am I off base (that is to say, you are
>> doing something that does NOT involve the whole libgcc_s.so.1 library)?
>>
> Still want to use libgcc
>
>> Thanks man.  I'm being patient.  I didn't know you were working on it.  I
>> have been working on it since e-mail a week ago or so.  I wasn't expecting
>> anything out of the developers of uClibc, but was attempting to fix
>> something and actually (for a change) contribute in place of just use ;).
>>
>> Andy
> Cheers
> Carmelo

Cheers
Filippo
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>
>