[PATCH] Revert "parser_config.[ch]: remove duplicated hidden functions"

[Khem Raj]

On May 8, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> wrote:

> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:32:57PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> 
>> On May 6, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1 at synopsys.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> This attribute_hidden should not be resurrected.
>>> 
>>> Is this because uClibc convention is to specify this only with
>>> prototypes which is already being done.
>> 
>> is it possible to rename the conflicting functions in busy box?
> 
> This is definitely the wrong solution. If uClibc is clashing with the
> namespace reserved for the application, the symbol name in uClibc
> needs to be fixed not to clash (i.e. appropriately prefixed with
> underscores).

Yes thats better