[PATCH] Revert "parser_config.[ch]: remove duplicated hidden functions"

Rich Felker dalias at aerifal.cx
Wed May 8 17:55:29 UTC 2013


On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:32:57PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> 
> On May 6, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1 at synopsys.com> wrote:
> 
> >> This attribute_hidden should not be resurrected.
> > 
> > Is this because uClibc convention is to specify this only with
> > prototypes which is already being done.
> 
> is it possible to rename the conflicting functions in busy box?

This is definitely the wrong solution. If uClibc is clashing with the
namespace reserved for the application, the symbol name in uClibc
needs to be fixed not to clash (i.e. appropriately prefixed with
underscores).

Rich


More information about the uClibc mailing list