[PATCH] Revert "parser_config.[ch]: remove duplicated hidden functions"

Tue May 7 10:06:19 UTC 2013

On 7 May 2013 07:32:20 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1 at synopsys.com> wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 10:02 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On May 6, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1 at synopsys.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> This attribute_hidden should not be resurrected.
> >> Is this because uClibc convention is to specify this only with 
> prototypes which is
> >> already being done.
> > is it possible to rename the conflicting functions in busy box?
>
> I suppose we could - but the hidden proto for these still has value in that PLT
> can be avoided for calls within uClibc.

uClibc copied the config parser from Busybox, not the other way round. I 
initially did not rename them to ease syncing back from Busybox.
>
> -Vineet


Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com