Next release of uclibc

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Wed Mar 20 10:47:41 UTC 2013


On 14 March 2013 19:14, Bernd Kuhls <berndkuhls at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Florian Fainelli <florian at openwrt.org> wrote in news:514048AA.7070400
> @openwrt.org:
>
>> Is there any thing that you want to merge before rolling out a 0.9.33.3
>> release?
>
> Hi,
>
> two patches regarding DNS stuff are missing, their description can be found
> here:
> https://ssl.nettworks.org/repo/browse/fli4l/branches/testing/src/src/fbr/buil
> droot/toolchain/uClibc/README.patches?r=26288
>
> First patch:
> https://ssl.nettworks.org/repo/browse/fli4l/branches/testing/src/src/fbr/buil
> droot/toolchain/uClibc/uClibc-0.9.33.2-resolve-any.patch?hb=true
> The discussion about this patch can be found here:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.uclibc.general/22497

I have applied this one now. It was buried in a local resolv TLC branch..
>
> Second patch:
> https://ssl.nettworks.org/repo/browse/fli4l/branches/testing/src/src/fbr/buil
> droot/toolchain/uClibc/uClibc-0.9.33.2-inet_fix_res_init.patch?hb=true
> Original patch was posted here:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.uclibc.general/22572
> But that original patch from OpenWRT ( https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/11495 )
> seems to be wrong, the patch included in the FLI4L project can be found in
> the link posted above.

Do you have a testcase for this second one? I'm not sure what this is
supposed to fix.
Thanks,


More information about the uClibc mailing list