[PATCH v3 00/48] Support for cut-down Linux syscalls

[Markos Chandras]

On 6 February 2013 10:06, Will Newton <will.newton at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Markos Chandras
> <markos.chandras at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 5 February 2013 19:08, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> <rep.dot.nop at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 23 January 2013 12:41, Markos Chandras <markos.chandras at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras at imgtec.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This is the v3 of the patchset I sent on the 26th of November 2012[1].
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>
>>>> - Base patches on the uClibc master branch
>>>> - Fix libc_hidden_def for faccessat when implementing the access syscall[2]
>>>> - Make vfork act as fork using the clone syscall[3]
>>>> - Fix #ifdef clause for the stat syscall[4]
>>>> - c6x is a new arch, so it does not need ARCH_HAS_DEPRECATED_SYSCALLS[5]
>>>> - Fix non-LFS compilation problems[6]
>>>> - Add new struct stat and struct statfs for new architectures so we can
>>>> pass them directly to syscalls and avoid conversion code[7]
>>>
>>> Looks pretty good, thanks. One thing though:
>>>
>>> I really don't like common-no-legacy.
>>> Can you propose a different way instread?
>>
>> Hi Bernhard,
>>
>> Thanks for taking time reviewing this patchset.
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> - common-new
>> - new-interfaces
>
> generic
> generic-syscalls
>
> generic wouldn't be entirely self-explanatory but would be short. ;-)

I'd prefer generic-syscalls. 'generic' seems similar to 'common' so it
might be a bit confusing. Bernhard, are you ok with
"generic-syscalls"?

-- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras