Bug in _scanf.c

Will Newton will.newton at gmail.com
Tue Apr 2 12:43:22 UTC 2013


On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Pirmin Walthert <infos at nappsoft.com> wrote:

> That's ok for me (as the most important thing is not to have a regression in
> the next release) but in fact the first of the following patches would have
> been enough to fix the bug. However the second patch would have been the
> preferred one, as there would be a potential memory-leak without it (in case
> of m modifier and sc.width > 0).

Hi Pirmin,

Thanks for finding this bug. Both these patches look ok to me,
although I guess they should be resent with a Signed-off-by (e.g. from
git format-patch).


More information about the uClibc mailing list