Regression caused by future merge utent.c, wtent.c: move functions from utxent.c
Peter Mazinger
ps.m at gmx.net
Thu Sep 13 08:40:53 UTC 2012
Hello Khem,
no idea at the moment, I can't see anything wrong with this change. Please send me you config. Which version of toolchain (gcc/binutils) are you using and which arch fails?
Thanks, Peter
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:39:02 -0700
> Von: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> An: uclibc at uclibc.org, rep.dot.nop at gmail.com, ps.m at gmx.net
> Betreff: Regression caused by future merge utent.c, wtent.c: move functions from utxent.c
>
> Hi Peter/Bernhard
>
> We have a regression on master which is that systemd does not boot the
> system anymore
> whereas it works fine with 0.9.33 branch so I did not bisecting and this
> boiled down
> to below commit. If I revert that then everything is working again. Please
> take a look
> what could be wrong here. The commit comment "The smaller size on utent.os
> is unexpected, could be due to better inlining/not inlining"
> does not effuse lot of confidence in this patch. I would ask to revert
> this commit if
> there is no easy resolution.
>
> commit 84135275cfeebc0b233c1c96eeada4d4178a0b18
> Author: Peter S. Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net>
> Date: Tue Mar 15 15:29:14 2011 +0100
>
> utent.c, wtent.c: move functions from utxent.c
>
> before the change (threads enabled)
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1107 8 408 1523 5f3 libc/misc/utmp/utent.os
> 152 0 0 152 98 libc/misc/utmp/wtent.os
> 240 0 0 240 f0 libc/misc/utmp/utxent.os
> after the change
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1072 8 408 1488 5d0 libc/misc/utmp/utent.os
> 157 0 0 157 9d libc/misc/utmp/wtent.os
> 200 0 0 200 c8 libc/misc/utmp/utxent.os
>
> The smaller size on utent.os is unexpected, could be due to better
> inlining/not inlining
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter S. Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop at gmail.com>
>
>
> --
> -Khem
More information about the uClibc
mailing list