[PATCH] fcntl cleanup

[Mark Salter]

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 16:40 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Mark, this is handled on the future branch. Attaching the relevant
> patches for reference.

Ah, good to know. Thanks for pointing that out.

The code in the future branch is much better organized but it
still relies on the fcntl syscall which may not exist. It also
tests for the fctnl64 locking commands unnecessarily for some
configurations.

So, in general should I be working on the future branch for
new development?

--Mark