future branch

[Bernhard Reutner-Fischer]

On 8 February 2012 16:15, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<rep.dot.nop at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> fine, tell me about problems you encounter...
>
> Peter,
> I am merging your future branch into master ATM. A couple of questions:
>
> db97b8bb3859fb28e2b36934e48de90a17c06222 removed the guard for
> __NR_socketcall but there are arches that have individual "socketcall"
> impls (like x86_64, alpha for sure) and i don't see __NR_socketcall
> for e.g. xtensa, c6x either. reinstalled.

re-added guard and pushed to the future branch.

> 1ee4b98476a83d5f139e863d6f71a9356a046edd can you explain why always
> hardcoding the interp path is a good idea?
> You seem to lose (and have lost in the past) ", or (at your option)
> any later version." from touching boilerplates, which is a bad thing.

I could use your help with f69319d5a7d3a3ccb46b28ee2b0fd9053c6415ac from master:
gcc -Wl,-EL -shared -Wl,--warn-common -Wl,--warn-once -Wl,-z,combreloc
-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-s  -Wl,-fini,dl_cleanup
-Wl,-soname=libdl.so.0 -nostdlib -o lib/libdl-0.9.34-git.so
-Wl,--whole-archive ldso/libdl/libdl_so.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive
./lib/interp.os -L./lib ./lib/libc.so ./lib/ld64-uClibc.so.0
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/libgcc.a
/usr/bin/ld: ldso/libdl/libdl_so.a(libdl.oS): relocation R_X86_64_PC32
against undefined hidden symbol `__pthread_mutex_unlock' can not be
used when making a shared object
Thoughts?