future branch

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 20:51:35 UTC 2012

On Feb 8, 2012 9:29 PM, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:

I am redoing the full merge now, with my usual (super cautious) hat on.
Anyway, can you reproduce the ?etnetgrent() stuff with sato?

It is amazing how anybody seems to fail to get recommendations (think
configure flags) right.
How hard can it be to have a resolver that provides a set of (virtual,
inherently) packages that provide their virtual (sub-)duties on one hand,
and on the other hand (optionally) require a set of duties to be selectable
(come into play to satisfy a duty)?

More information about the uClibc mailing list