future branch

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 06:45:55 UTC 2012


On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <carmelo.amoroso at st.com> wrote:
> On 02/02/2012 23.04, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net> wrote:
>>>>>> they are already rebased on master here https://github.com/kraj/uClibc
>>>>>> so i will start from there and if you can help in issues as we find
>>>>>> that will be useful
>>>>>> i want to avoid breakages
>>>>>
>>>>> fine, tell me about problems you encounter...
>>>>
>>>> The current tree from khem does not compile with SUPPORT_LD_DEBUG=n
>>>> Didn't look yet which change is the culprit.
>>>
>>> Khem, have you left out anything from the future branch? I can compile with and without the above option the future branch, haven't tested your tree...
>>
>> well. I have not left anything out intentionally. But I have to patch
>> some stuff locally. I have patches around for some arches on top. It
>> does compile for me with those patches applied but does not boot.
>
> I'll give a try on SH4... asap
>


I have rebased the branch on latest master

git://github.com/kraj/uClibc.git

havent tested with the latest rebase please try it out.

>> _______________________________________________
>> uClibc mailing list
>> uClibc at uclibc.org
>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc


More information about the uClibc mailing list