future branch

Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amoroso at st.com
Fri Feb 3 13:16:26 UTC 2012

On 02/02/2012 23.04, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net> wrote:
>>>>> they are already rebased on master here https://github.com/kraj/uClibc
>>>>> so i will start from there and if you can help in issues as we find
>>>>> that will be useful
>>>>> i want to avoid breakages
>>>> fine, tell me about problems you encounter...
>>> The current tree from khem does not compile with SUPPORT_LD_DEBUG=n
>>> Didn't look yet which change is the culprit.
>> Khem, have you left out anything from the future branch? I can compile with and without the above option the future branch, haven't tested your tree...
> well. I have not left anything out intentionally. But I have to patch
> some stuff locally. I have patches around for some arches on top. It
> does compile for me with those patches applied but does not boot.

I'll give a try on SH4... asap

> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

More information about the uClibc mailing list