future branch

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Thu Feb 2 15:14:09 UTC 2012

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net> wrote:
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:03:28 -0800
>> Von: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>> An: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop at gmail.com>
>> CC: Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net>, uclibc at uclibc.org
>> Betreff: Re: future branch
>> yes  now that .33 is released we will work on putting these patches
>> in. unfortunately
>> these patches need to rebase on top of master and currently my rebase
>> does not boot
>> so we need Peter's help to refresh them
> how do you think my help should look like? After waiting so long the rework is tremendous, it is like I would restart from the beginning (from my mercurial repo). Should I again clear/redo future branch or do you want me to send each patch to list or apply directly to head?
> I think the last one is unacceptable for some of you.
> Waiting for opinions...

they are already rebased on master here https://github.com/kraj/uClibc
so i will start from there and if you can help in issues as we find
that will be useful
i want to avoid breakages

> Regards, Peter
> --
> Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
> belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

More information about the uClibc mailing list