CONFIG_ARM_EABI versus ARM_EABI

Peter Mazinger ps.m at gmx.net
Fri Mar 11 12:33:59 UTC 2011


Hi

> >> I have a patch around since 2007 for arm, could anyone check if it is
> valid and
> >> apply it?
> >>
> > I've a gcc 4.5.0 configured as arm-cortex-linux-gnueabi and __ARM_EABI__
> > is actually defined. So changes looks fine to me.
> >
> 
> gcc wont be issue. If other compilers are used and don't have this 
> define builtin but chances are small of such a case.

everywhere I can see __ARM_EABI__ is used, one hunk would be no problem. The question is rather, do you want the consistency check in uClibc_arch_features.h?

Peter
-- 
Schon gehört? GMX hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die
Toolbar eingebaut! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/toolbar


More information about the uClibc mailing list