proposal for CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

[Peter Mazinger]

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:04:36 -0700
> Von: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> An: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org>
> CC: uclibc at uclibc.org
> Betreff: Re: proposal for CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 15:47, Peter Mazinger wrote:
> >> I am proposing to add CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL to guard all config options
> that
> >
> > ive found this option to be wholly useless in the kernel.  i dont see
> > it being any different in any other project.
> >
> > what does seem to work is manually adding "(EXPERIMENTAL)" or
> > "(DEPRECATED)" to the Kconfig line of text.
> 
> yes that seems a good approach

Even if I do not think, that people are reading the text (they are using
some preprepared .config files and are not confronted with the fact, that
they should read the text in Kconfig), I can live with that too ;-)

Peter
> 
> >
> >> This way we limit the general bug reports to working configs,
> >
> > bugs are bugs.  if you want to classify them "lower", bugzilla has a
> > priority field in it already.
> > -mike
> > _______________________________________________
> > uClibc mailing list
> > uClibc at uclibc.org
> > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> >
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

-- 
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren!			
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone