Backtrace in uClibC
Carmelo Amoroso
carmelo73 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 15 19:49:29 UTC 2011
On 12/01/11 17:50, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
> I noticed that almost exactly a year ago Carmelo Amoroso posted stating
> that he hoped to do more work on backtrace. After looking at
> libubactrace/sh/backtrace.c, I'm confused as to why this is platform
> dependant code. The code appears to ONLY use library calls that should
> be available on _any_ platform. I have copied the code to a mips
> subdirectory and am testing at the moment, but I'm curious as to what
> potential problems I'll find; due to my wealth of knowledge of backtrace
> (that would be 0) I'm sure I don't know why this would not work.
>
> If you have any information, please enlighten me!
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
Hi Andy,
likely you are right and the current sh implementation can be widely used.
Let me a few time to review this code.
In the meanwhile you're feedback with your try n mips would be helpful.
Cheers,
Carmelo
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>
More information about the uClibc
mailing list