uClibc-0.9.30.3-rc1

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Wed Mar 3 22:44:38 UTC 2010


On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag at dottedmag.net> wrote:
>
> Twas brillig at 14:19:10 03.03.2010 UTC-08 when raj.khem at gmail.com did gyre and gimble:
>
>  KR> I would like to propose that we have a longer RC period and stabilize
>  KR> master after merging nptl.
>
> Uhm, another 3-4 years?

How did you deduce that ? instead of being sarcastic your energy would
be better spent on helping to make the release

>
>  KR> 1. There is enough interest base who want it and they will still have
>  KR> to wait for next release
>
> Why not make 0.9.31 and then 0.9.32 with NPTL after "longer RC period"?
>

Because efforts would be spend on releasing .31 and merging/ creating
another RC immediately after
will divide the efforts.

> --
>  http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>


More information about the uClibc mailing list