INLINE_SYSCALL for m68k or sparc?
lsorense at csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Tue Jan 12 14:49:49 UTC 2010
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:24:36PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> In the git -devel branch I see an "INTERNAL_SYSCALL" but no "INLINE_SYSCALL".
> The final release of uClibc has neither.
0.9.30.1 certainly does not. I guess that is the latest release.
> Actually my main problem with looking at what's in git (if it's not a trivial
> backport) is that the final release of uClibc from the development branch was
> over a year ago, and there are no plans for another one that I am aware of.
That's certainly a very bad plan if that is actually the plan.
> The last bugfix-only release was 10 months ago. There were plans for another
> bugfix-only release three months ago, but it never materialized. (Since the
> last uClibc bugfix-only release, 0.9.30.1, busybox has put out 1.13.3, 1.14.0,
> 1.14.1, 1.14.2, 1.14.3, 1.15.0, 1.14.4, 1.15.1, 1.15.2, and 1.15.3. Meanwhile
> the Linux kernel put out 4 development releases and 33 bugfix releases. I note
> that the linux kernel "bugfix-only" team is 2 part-time guys. My own Firmware
> Linux project (which is my hobby programming time plus an average of maybe
> another half-time person from other contributors) has put out four releases
> since then and (is working on a fifth).
Yeah releases are good. It gives people something to refer to, and
reasons for upgrading.
> When you say "in the git tree", do you mean the proposed 0.9.30.2 stuff last
> discussed here in October (ok, one message about it in november), the -devel
> branch that's been ongoing with no roadmap for 14 months, or the -nptl branch
> that's been ongoing with no roadmap since at least 2006?
I think I meant -devel. I am not sure.
More information about the uClibc