0.9.32.2 build breaks on sparc due to __libc_sigaction.

[Rob Landley]

On Tuesday 02 February 2010 00:58:38 Khem Raj wrote:
> >> I do not understand this at _all_.
> >
> > Yeah join the club. Thanks for pointing this out. I have no problem with
> > your patch and is what I would have done if I had hit this build error.
> > Still confused why I didn't hit this though...
>
> probably you did not try with lt.old for nptl and lt.new the define
> LIBC_SIGACTION is defined thru their respective sysdeps/pthread/sigaction.c

Between the fix for mips, the fix for sparc, and the random other changes that 
have gone into the 0_9_30 tree (which I suppose I need to test to make sure 
they didn't break anything here), how close are we to justifying a .3 bugfix 
release?

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds