prelink integration

Carmelo Amoroso carmelo73 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 27 10:23:09 UTC 2010


On 17/12/10 22:21, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:38:13PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On (14/12/10 15:05), Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>> I'm periodically merging stuff from master back to prelink to keep them
>>> up-to-date and usable to everyone would like to play with prelinking.
>>>
>>> Did someone do ?
>>>
>>> Once we will have the protected symbols reworked (by using the sym_value
>>> struct as described in some previous emails), I'll work to integrate
>>> this change into the prelink head where it will cause a conflict as
>>> expected.
>>>
>>> After that I'd like to start with integrating this big piece of work
>>> into the master... but we need more people to look at this feature and
>>> comment.
>>
>> I will look into it probably next week.
> 
> I'll try to find some time to look at it during christmas.
>>
>>>
>>> Please do not keep this branch living alone for a so long time as we did
>>> for NPTL ;-)
>>
>> yes we should not.
> 
> I suggest we merge it right after 0.9.32 (i.e. end of january), ok?

yes it's ok. We can think to have a .33-rc1, the changes are in some intrusive in the
ld.so

Thanks,
Carmelo

> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> 



More information about the uClibc mailing list