[ANNOUNCE] 0.9.32-rc1 released

Fri Dec 24 18:17:12 UTC 2010

"Ed W" <lists at wildgooses.com> wrote:

>
>> Hello,
>> Why 0.9.32-rc2? IIRC after nptl support it was discussed that it
>would 
>> be good
>> to have 1.0.0 version for next release.
>
>I tend to agree that version 1.0.0 is a good choice?
>
>Version number is of course a completely arbitrary stake in the ground,
>
>but in a large number of projects it's used as a crude indicator of 
>project progress.  The next release seems eminently worth of a 1.0
>number?
>
>Cheers
>
>Ed W
>_______________________________________________
>uClibc mailing list
>uClibc at uclibc.org
>http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Hi,

Once we've done a full SUSv4 audit we could start thinking about something like a 1.0.0. 
This release will be 0.9.32