[PATCH][SH] sys/user.h

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Wed Sep 16 14:12:29 UTC 2009

On Wednesday 16 September 2009 05:11:30 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 15/09/09 23:05, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > we use git now, and this patch was against the glibc repo rather than the
> > uClibc repo, so i had to redo all of the lower cruft.  i added your s-o-b
> > tag since you wrote the code.
> Huh?
> I know you use git now - that's where I got the code from. The last log
> entry in the repository I have is from September 9th. The patch was
> against uClibc, not glibc. I don't understand why it wouldn't apply?
> I've just done a git pull, and I see the patch now applied, thanks.
> I don't understand - what did I do wrong?

the patch uses -p0 which confused me, and when i glanced at the patch, it 
didnt look like a normal git patch: it used -p0, lacked git commit message 
(used the useless GNU style instead), and had no s-o-b tag.

so you're right it was against the uClibc git and if i applied manually with 
`patch -p0`, it would have applied cleanly.  but none of the other git 
methodology was used thus preventing a clean `git am -3 -s <mbox>`.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20090916/13d0485e/attachment.pgp>

More information about the uClibc mailing list