Commit 6625518cd6 broke cross compiling?

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Sun Sep 6 12:22:56 UTC 2009


2009/9/5 Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org>:
> On Saturday 05 September 2009 14:14:40 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 08:12:48AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >leveraging $(ARCH) makes sense in my mind and aligns it with the build
>> > systems we are copying from ...
>>
>> Ok, i'll have a look sometimes next week.
>
> i thought we were already leveraging $(ARCH) :)
>
> when i want to do a Blackfin defconfig, i do:
> make CROSS_COMPILE=bfin-linux-uclibc- ARCH=bfin defconfig

We do. There seems to be irritation that you had to always pass  ARCH
(even after configuration).
Attached patch would use the configured ARCH for subsequent
invocations of make(1) and not require it to be always passed down.
Perhaps that's more what some expect.. ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: uClibc-retain-configured-target-arch.00.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1933 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20090906/01da592a/attachment.bin>


More information about the uClibc mailing list