[PATCH] implement futimes

[Mike Frysinger]

On Monday 23 November 2009 05:20:22 Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 22 November 2009 21:26:56 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 November 2009 22:19:47 Austin Foxley wrote:
> > > First step towards sanity: Let me commit the nptl_merge branch to
> > > master. If you haven't looked at it, I've got all the relevant changes
> > > for nptl grouped into related commits, and it's up to date with master
> > > as of today.
> > >
> > > I'm going ahead with Step 1 in a day or so, unless someone yells
> > > loudly.
> >
> > i would like to go through it first, at least as a "fresh set of eyes". 
> > i dont want to see more accidental merge commits throwing out good code.
> 
> More code review's always nice, but it's been pending for three years now.
> Couldn't a fresh set of eyes go through it as easily after the merge as
> before?

it hasnt been put up for merging before.  so either you can review the pending 
branch, or you can sit back and wait.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20091123/7879d535/attachment.pgp>