[PATCH] implement futimes

[Rob Landley]

On Sunday 22 November 2009 21:26:56 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 22 November 2009 22:19:47 Austin Foxley wrote:
> > First step towards sanity: Let me commit the nptl_merge branch to
> > master. If you haven't looked at it, I've got all the relevant changes
> > for nptl grouped into related commits, and it's up to date with master
> > as of today.
> >
> > I'm going ahead with Step 1 in a day or so, unless someone yells loudly.
>
> i would like to go through it first, at least as a "fresh set of eyes".  i
> dont want to see more accidental merge commits throwing out good code.
> -mike

More code review's always nice, but it's been pending for three years now.  
Couldn't a fresh set of eyes go through it as easily after the merge as 
before?

The nptl merge _will_ break stuff.  We can't prevent that.  But once it's in
-dev, we can all test it, and we can fix it.

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds