[PATCH] implement futimes

[Rob Landley]

On Sunday 22 November 2009 12:07:54 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> after skimming the noise, i think you failed to address concerns with the
> patch itself.  i never say "futimes wont be added", i merely suggested you
> encourage the UML guys to use POSIX interfaces instead of glibc-specific
> ones. -mike

It's actually easier for me to get a patch into a linux kernel release than it 
is to get one into a uClibc release.  (Mainly because I'm reasonably confident 
of living to _see_ the next linux kernel release.)  Since doing so "scratches 
my itch", I'm no longer using the patch I submitted.  Instead I plan to push a 
patch to User Mode Linux (as soon as I finish debugging it, anyway).

Thanks for the suggestion,

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds