On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:31:40PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: >Why is the __nonnull(2) still there? Isn't the point of this to ensure that >the second argument _can_ be null? Please read the whole thread, the __nonnull(2) was removed in what was checked in as 2c3ed060512a2e90ec9f912cf1a5eb1ecd700fb9