malloc & friends hidden proto issues

[Mike Frysinger]

On Monday 20 July 2009 07:34:32 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > but the default should be what
> > we have today -- the malloc symbols can be resolved dynamically at
> > runtime. this is how many debugging libraries work in the first place --
> > they provide the malloc() and related symbols.
>
> this is the answer I was looking for. I thought to remove the relocation
> for malloc too, but I was wrong.

would documenting this somewhere help ?  strategically placed comments tend to 
go a long way ...
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20090720/5bf8c0c5/attachment.pgp>