100KiB limit is too low

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 18:35:23 UTC 2009


On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 04:59:58PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Folks,
>we are trying to push some patch we did @ ST to extend uclibc
>adding argp and FTS support.
>My colleague is having  some problems sending patches because the size threashold
>is set to 100KiB.
>So he had to split patches in separate chunks, but despite this,
>a patch file (of ~10KiB) is still blocked.

I just let that 114k patch through but i do not see any other held patch from
Salvatore?
>
>Is it possible to enlarge a bit the threshold value ?

Usually this limit is fine, larger stuff should be split into it's conceptual parts
(or xz'ed or bzip2'ed)

How big is argp support btw?


More information about the uClibc mailing list