timer_create (__UCLIBC_MJN3_ONLY__)

[Rob Landley]

On Thursday 08 January 2009 10:06:07 rhabarber1848 wrote:
> Mike Wilson wrote:
>
> How are the chances that the glibc fallback code gets implemented in
> uClibc?

Sounds like featureitis to me.  (The whole point of uClibc is to be as small 
and simple as possible, otherwise we _would_ just be using glibc...)

While I'm somewhat sympathetic to 2.4 being smaller than 2.6, it's also a six 
year old codebase.  If 2.6 isn't a good replacement for 2.4 in new deployments 
yet, then 2.6 needs to be _fixed_.

Rob