status of 0.9.30 release
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Sat Sep 27 22:09:41 UTC 2008
On Friday 26 September 2008 10:06:22 Chase Douglas wrote:
> Has anyone else tried to compile openssh against the new linuxthreads
> stack? When I tried a few weeks ago it failed to compile auth-pam.c.
> In that file they do some pretty wacky stuff like redefining some of
> the pthread functions. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a way
> to get that file to build due to the way the uClibc pthread header
> files are architected. So my suggestion would be to make sure that
> openssh can compile against uClibc with the newer linuxthreads stack
> before contemplating getting right of the older linuxthreads stack.
See, this is exactly the sort of bug report we _don't_ get unless we at least
threaten to make the old one go away.
At this point, it's been so long since 0.9.29 shipped that 0.9.30 is going to
need a 0.9.30.1 fairly promptly, from the bug reports of people who don't try
it until it ships and then find some regression snuck in over the past year
and a half. We can't avoid it, we should just face up to it.
Getting as many people as possible to test it before we ship is of course
vital. (Mentioning -rc1 on the uClibc website might be a good idea, but the
website seems to have moved out of the main archive and I have no interest in
tracking down where it went.)
> Also, I posted a patch to rectify a pthread fork mutex issue for
> linuxthreads.old. I am not convinced that the newer linuxthreads stack
> safely deals with the situation either, so porting that patch may be
> wise. It shouldn't take hardly any work to do so as well.
I'm guessing you're referring to:
http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-September/020110.html
And yes, I'd like to have this discussion about the new linuxthreads.
Possibly I should look for all svn commits to the old linuxthreads and see
which ones are needed in the new one. I'll add it to the todo heap...
> Thanks,
> Chase Douglas
Rob
More information about the uClibc
mailing list