[PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

Corinna Schultz cschultz at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Sep 23 23:14:59 UTC 2008


Quoting Carmelo AMOROSO <carmelo.amoroso at st.com>:
> Does anybody (other than sh4) tried posix_fadvise tests?

Carmelo, I was finally able to test this today. The tests are still  
failing for me (I'm on ppc32), though for different reasons than  
before :-) . I have not tried the ppc workaround patch yet, though.  
I'll let you know.








More information about the uClibc mailing list