[PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]
Corinna Schultz
cschultz at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Sep 23 23:14:59 UTC 2008
Quoting Carmelo AMOROSO <carmelo.amoroso at st.com>:
> Does anybody (other than sh4) tried posix_fadvise tests?
Carmelo, I was finally able to test this today. The tests are still
failing for me (I'm on ppc32), though for different reasons than
before :-) . I have not tried the ppc workaround patch yet, though.
I'll let you know.
More information about the uClibc
mailing list