confirmed working NPTL revision?

Bernd Schmidt bernds_cb1 at t-online.de
Tue Sep 16 13:01:39 UTC 2008


Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> No, what we do is we keep the 0.9.29 tarball around and if people have bugs 
>> trying to use 0.9.30 they _report_ them to us.  If they want to use the old 
>> threading code, they can use the old version of the library.  If they want 
>> the new features, then they help us find (and fix) the new bugs.
>>
> It may be a solution... I' don't have the power to drop linuxthrad.old 
> anyway... we need a wider agreement (Mike, Jocke, Bernhard, Bernd..others ?)

We're still using linuxthreads.old on the Blackfin.  Once NPTL is in 
trunk, I'll have a stab at doing a Blackfin port, but for the moment I 
wouldn't like to see linuxthreads.old go away.

We haven't tried the newer linuxthreads.  It may be worth it trying to 
move towards it.


Bernd
-- 
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif



More information about the uClibc mailing list