confirmed working NPTL revision?
Bernd Schmidt
bernds_cb1 at t-online.de
Tue Sep 16 13:01:39 UTC 2008
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> No, what we do is we keep the 0.9.29 tarball around and if people have bugs
>> trying to use 0.9.30 they _report_ them to us. If they want to use the old
>> threading code, they can use the old version of the library. If they want
>> the new features, then they help us find (and fix) the new bugs.
>>
> It may be a solution... I' don't have the power to drop linuxthrad.old
> anyway... we need a wider agreement (Mike, Jocke, Bernhard, Bernd..others ?)
We're still using linuxthreads.old on the Blackfin. Once NPTL is in
trunk, I'll have a stab at doing a Blackfin port, but for the moment I
wouldn't like to see linuxthreads.old go away.
We haven't tried the newer linuxthreads. It may be worth it trying to
move towards it.
Bernd
--
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif
More information about the uClibc
mailing list