[PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

[Corinna Schultz]

Quoting Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>:

> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO   
> <carmelo.amoroso at st.com> wrote:
>> Hi Corinna, may you try the attached patch.
>> It worked fine for NPTL branch solving all LTP posix_fadvise tests.
>> Let me know, so we can enqueue for commit.

>
> It needs to to be tested on all arches which use common/posix_fadvise*
> implementation.
>

I can only test it on ppc32 for the time being. Also, I don't know  
when I'll be able to test it. I'm going to be out of the office for  
the next few days.

I'll let you all know how it works for my setup. Thanks, Carmelo!

-Corinna Schultz
IBM LTC