Standards compliance?

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Wed Nov 5 09:11:04 UTC 2008


On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:02:52PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On Tuesday 04 November 2008 16:58:50 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>>> > What's the uClibc position on SUSv3?  Has anybody checked
>>> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/idx/head.html
>>> > to see what lines up and what's optional?
>>>
>>> there's a doc and everything:
>>> docs/uClibc_vs_SuSv3.txt
>>
>> Last updated in 2005.  Is that still current?

No, it's not current anymore and there was no reference to a script to
extract the SUS set of functions (and my script to do that was very,
very ugly).

Both an audit and patches are very welcome..

>> (Sorry, should have phrased it more as a status request...)
>
>oh, and the point of the doc is two fold: (1) it states our intent
>quite clearly i think and (2) contains a semi-status report.



More information about the uClibc mailing list