Stubbing out unavailable syscalls?
Bernhard Fischer
rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Tue May 20 20:20:20 UTC 2008
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:07:26PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>Still think ease of cross compiling is more important than stubs.
I don't see how this is in any way related to cross compilation since
sysnum.h is created just fine either way. Please elaborate?
>Are there any apps that is broken due to missing stubs?
Anything that checks if a syscall "works" is potentially affected.
>I can live with stubs behind a config option, default off.
More information about the uClibc
mailing list