Stubbing out unavailable syscalls?

Bernhard Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Tue May 20 20:20:20 UTC 2008


On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:07:26PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:

>Still think ease of cross compiling is more important than stubs.

I don't see how this is in any way related to cross compilation since
sysnum.h is created just fine either way. Please elaborate?

>Are there any apps that is broken due to missing stubs?

Anything that checks if a syscall "works" is potentially affected.

>I can live with stubs behind a config option, default off. 



More information about the uClibc mailing list