[PATCH] mknod fix for major/minor number greater than 255

[Basheer, Mansoor Ahamed]

Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> I've executed your test built against glibc2.61 and it fails as
uClibc.
> I have not spent time to investigate what is the correct behavior.
> So, are we sure uClibc needs to be fixed ?
> 

I tested it on uclibc-0.9.29 based system not on glibc system. The mknod
change seems to be required in uclibc but the test application has to be
redone.

-Mansoor