Test build failed due to UCLIBC_INTERNAL header rework

Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amoroso at st.com
Wed Jun 11 14:12:26 UTC 2008

Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> I have no comment on the patch itself, but I like the approach - I've
>> concluded before that this is the only sane way to test toolchain
>> pieces, especially compiler or C library.  We do all of our testing
>> after installation here.
> My patch doesn't really create a full installation tree that looks 
> identical to the one created by 'make install'; that might require 
> somewhat more effort (unless we want to just $(MAKE) install 
> DESTDIR=somewhere/in/tree for every make test).
> Bernd
Hi Bernd,
I like it too... and I prefer your easier approach instead of having a 
full installation of headers.
Indeed what we need now is to able to build the test-suite from the 
working tree.


More information about the uClibc mailing list