[PATCH] splice, vmsplice and tee for i386

Timo Teräs timo.teras at iki.fi
Tue Apr 22 08:43:01 UTC 2008


Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org [mailto:uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org] On
>> Behalf Of Bernhard Fischer
>> Sent: den 21 april 2008 14:21
>> To: Timo Teräs
>> Cc: uclibc at uclibc.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] splice, vmsplice and tee for i386
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:33:59PM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> splice et al for i386. Against svn trunk.
>> Ah, yes. We should also see if using some of the new syscalls help
>> busybox.
>>
>> I'll apply this patch in a few days unless i hear something
>> controversial.
>>
>> thanks and cheers,
>> Bernhard
> 
> Any particular reason to uncomment sync_file_range() in fcntl.h? 
> It does not seem to be part of the patch.

My bad. I was also doing the same patch for 0.9.28.3 and got confused
with the headers a bit.

> Also, you might as well take the latest fcntl.h from glibc while at
> it to get a couple of missing defines (unrelated to splice).

I just took the new protos for related calls. But might be good to
take the whole header. I'll make a new patch today.

- Timo




More information about the uClibc mailing list