utils/readelf built twice?
Filippo ARCIDIACONO
filippo.arcidiacono at st.com
Wed Apr 2 13:41:23 UTC 2008
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernhard Fischer [mailto:rep.dot.nop at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:01 PM
> To: Filippo ARCIDIACONO
> Cc: 'Carmelo AMOROSO'; uclibc at uclibc.org
> Subject: Re: utils/readelf built twice?
>
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:49:22PM +0200, Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org
> >> [mailto:uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org] On Behalf Of Bernhard Fischer
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:31 AM
> >> To: Carmelo AMOROSO
> >> Cc: uclibc at uclibc.org
> >> Subject: Re: utils/readelf built twice?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:06:21AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> >> > Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Can anybody confirm that
> >> >> make -C utils
> >> >> builds readelf twice?
> >No. The first one it is only the "echo" command output.
> >That, further, is different from the compilation command. In
> my opinion
> >there is something to fix.
> >Perhaps, simply removing "@$(disp_compile.c)" call from the
> "compile.u"
> >routine in Makerules file.
Looking the trunk tree, this issue has been fixed in the revision 21505.
Then it seems ok for me.
I don't understood why you had deleted the strip command.
> >The compilation command seems ok.
>
> What revision are you using?
I'm using the latest branch revision 17427.
> As mentioned below, i've since fixed this via
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> r21505 | aldot | 2008-03-26 19:49:16 +0100 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008)
> | 5 lines
>
> - improve building utils
> Either by first compiling objects and linking those or by
> just passing
> the source to create the desired binary (this patchlet does
> the latter).
> Fixes cosmetic glitch by just not building individual .o
> (in pwd, at least).
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> r21506 | aldot | 2008-03-26 20:40:39 +0100 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008)
> | 2 lines
>
> - fixup stripping of host utils and make host-utils compile with
> std=gnu99
>
> thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> thanks,
> >> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> > yes you're right !!!
> >> > further, ldconfig the second time is linked with
> >> chroot_realpath too.
> >>
> >> I think i improved the situation yesterday night. Please
> holler if i
> >> broke something.
> >>
> >> utils/*.c now even build with our default CFLAGS, i.e. with
> >> std=gnu99 Maybe i'll find the time to clean them up a
> little bit so
> >> they do not throw so many warnings..
> >>
> >> Thanks, Carmelo, for verifying this and cheers
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> uClibc mailing list
> >> uClibc at uclibc.org
> >> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> >>
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Filippo Arcidiacono.
> >
>
Filippo.
More information about the uClibc
mailing list