utils/readelf built twice?
Bernhard Fischer
rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Wed Apr 2 13:01:11 UTC 2008
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:49:22PM +0200, Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org
>> [mailto:uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org] On Behalf Of Bernhard Fischer
>> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:31 AM
>> To: Carmelo AMOROSO
>> Cc: uclibc at uclibc.org
>> Subject: Re: utils/readelf built twice?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:06:21AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> > Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Can anybody confirm that
>> >> make -C utils
>> >> builds readelf twice?
>No. The first one it is only the "echo" command output.
>That, further, is different from the compilation command. In my opinion
>there is something to fix.
>Perhaps, simply removing "@$(disp_compile.c)" call from the "compile.u"
>routine in Makerules file.
>The compilation command seems ok.
What revision are you using?
As mentioned below, i've since fixed this via
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r21505 | aldot | 2008-03-26 19:49:16 +0100 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008) | 5 lines
- improve building utils
Either by first compiling objects and linking those or by just passing
the source to create the desired binary (this patchlet does the latter).
Fixes cosmetic glitch by just not building individual .o (in pwd, at least).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r21506 | aldot | 2008-03-26 20:40:39 +0100 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008) | 2 lines
- fixup stripping of host utils and make host-utils compile with
std=gnu99
thanks,
>> >>
>> >> thanks,
>> >>
>> > Hi,
>> > yes you're right !!!
>> > further, ldconfig the second time is linked with
>> chroot_realpath too.
>>
>> I think i improved the situation yesterday night. Please
>> holler if i broke something.
>>
>> utils/*.c now even build with our default CFLAGS, i.e. with
>> std=gnu99 Maybe i'll find the time to clean them up a little
>> bit so they do not throw so many warnings..
>>
>> Thanks, Carmelo, for verifying this and cheers
>> _______________________________________________
>> uClibc mailing list
>> uClibc at uclibc.org
>> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>>
>
>Regards,
>
>Filippo Arcidiacono.
>
More information about the uClibc
mailing list