[PATCH] compiler warning cleanup in libcrypt/des.c

[Rob Landley]

On Thursday 15 March 2007 12:36 pm, David Daney wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2007 11:19 pm, Al Stone wrote:
> >> The good news is that this has been fixed in GCC 4.3.0.  I've filed
> >> bugzilla #31181 against GCC 4.1.2 for documentation purposes, if
> >> nothing else.
> > 
> > So 4.2 isn't out yet, and they're already saying "oh no, we can't fix this 
> > obvious bug in the current stable _or_ the next -devel release, we already 
> > fixed it in a version that won't have a stable release for a couple years 
> > yet."
> > 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31181
> 
> Did you read the PR?

Mostly I was just trying to ask whether it _would_ be fixed in 4.1 or 4.2.  (I 
admit the venting's sort of backlogged a bit when the topic comes up.)

> I know you like to rant about GCC,

I wouldn't say "like".  I have to make the darn thing work, and believe it 
really shouldn't be this hard on a number of fronts, but usually I've managed 
to bash through it.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29329
> 
> Is it not fixed in 4.1.2 which was released Feb. 13, 2007?

When I spoke to the guy the bug was assigned to a few weeks before 4.1.2 
shipped it hadn't been and they didn't have plans to do so, but that suggests 
it was, so [goes to test...]

Huh, it's working.  Dunno if it was the move to 4.1.2 or because 
http://trac.cross-lfs.org/browser/branches/clfs-embedded/patches/linux-2.6.20-squashfs-1.patch?rev=3359 
isn't triggering it the way 
http://trac.cross-lfs.org/browser/branches/clfs-embedded/patches/linux-2.6.19-squashfs-1.patch?rev=3176 
did, but either way I'm happy to call it "fixed" and stop complaining about 
it.

Thanks for pointing this out.  Sorry for being grumpy about it earlier.

> Perhaps your blog linked me to the wrong bug.

No, that was it:

http://landley.net/notes-2006.html#23-12-2006
http://landley.net/notes-2006.html#30-12-2006

Things have changed since then and I was behind the times.  The versions 
broken/working up at the top of the bug report weren't updated when 4.1.2 was 
released and I missed the new note at the end.

> David Daney.

Thanks,

Rob
-- 
Vista: Windows Millenium Second Edition