[Fwd: Re: AW: segmentation fault of dynamic executables with ld-uClibc.so.0 from0.9.29 on mipsel]

[Rob Landley]

On Sunday 03 June 2007 3:35 am, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Friday 01 June 2007 6:07 am, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> >> Why do you need to link it statically if the problem seems to be in 
ld.so?
> > 
> > Because if gdbserver is not linked statically, it needs ld.so to run, and 
> > ld.so is segfaulting?
> > 
> > This is just a guess.
> > 
> > Rob
> Yes, you're right; in this case I could suggest this alternative way,
> using a mixed glibc/uClibc target.

So you're saying they should attempt to cross-compile glibc for mips to debug 
this problem, when uClibc is already there and works when statically linked?

Why?

Rob