__uclibc_mutex_unlock

[Joakim Tjernlund]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Landley [mailto:rob at landley.net] 
> Sent: den 6 januari 2007 23:57
> To: uclibc at uclibc.org
> Cc: Joakim Tjernlund
> Subject: Re: __uclibc_mutex_unlock
> 
> On Friday 05 January 2007 9:10 pm, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> 
> > > Did some digging into the ARM SEGV landly has seen
> > > recently and this makes me wounder:
> ...
> > Took a crack at fixing this but I am too tiered(and lazy)
> > to test it.
> 
> Query, are you attempting to fix the segfault I'm seeing or 
> something else you 
> discovered while looking at the code?  (Are you saying if I 
> apply this patch 
> instead of the one I'm applying, it might also make the 
> armv4l segfault go 
> away?)

That was an attempt to fix your SEGV.

> 
> Also, about the first hunk:  is a typecast that ugly really 
> necessary, and 
> does it look wordwrap damaged to anybody else?

Yes, a bit ugly(but less so when applied) but I did find it a bit strange
to have a __uclibc_mutex there when all of the rest had _pthread_mutex.

Maybe this only change will fix your problem.
Would be intressting to know if the whole patch fixes you problem or if
it is enough with that type cast.

 Jocke