[PATCH] Re: readahead offset type (re: mantis 0001024)

Bernhard Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Fri Feb 2 10:43:44 UTC 2007


On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:53:07PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On Thursday 01 February 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> Either way, behaviour should imho be consistent, and it is not, from a
>> quick grep for ENOSYS. Didn't really look, admittedly.
>
>it isnt by any means

Please explain. What about the xattr family, siginterrupt(), bdflush et al?
Do i understand you right if you say that if the xattr syscalls are
unavailable or SA_RESTART is unavailable we do not ENOSYS as opposed to
lseek64 if LFS is off (where, from the looks, we do not provide a stub)?



More information about the uClibc mailing list