libdl in static build

Erik Andersen andersen at
Mon Sep 11 18:43:19 UTC 2006

On Sun Sep 10, 2006 at 04:19:07AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 04 September 2006 04:48, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> > is it possible to use libdl when uclibc is built without shared lib
> > support?
> in theory yes
> has any one actually tried ?  i dont think so

It used to work many moons ago -- I used to link a bunch of ldso
stuff into the libc.a to make it possible.  But I've not tried it
for ages and ldso has been reworked quite a lot since then.  So
as Mike says, in theory yes.  In practice -- maybe.


Erik B. Andersen   
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 

More information about the uClibc mailing list