libdl in static build
andersen at codepoet.org
Mon Sep 11 18:43:19 UTC 2006
On Sun Sep 10, 2006 at 04:19:07AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 04 September 2006 04:48, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> > is it possible to use libdl when uclibc is built without shared lib
> > support?
> in theory yes
> has any one actually tried ? i dont think so
It used to work many moons ago -- I used to link a bunch of ldso
stuff into the libc.a to make it possible. But I've not tried it
for ages and ldso has been reworked quite a lot since then. So
as Mike says, in theory yes. In practice -- maybe.
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20060911/a7d1da02/attachment-0002.pgp
More information about the uClibc